Monday, September 12, 2011

Shaw Capital Management Investment Deadlock for Japan

The Democratic Party of Japan’s (DPJ) landslide victory
in the Lower House election a year ago ushered in
euphoric predictions of bold new policies, and even a
transformation of the Japanese political system.
There were widespread hopes that the DPJ would end
the run of short-lived leaders. Instead, Prime Minister
Yukio Hatoyama’s tenure proved to be a slow-motion
train wreck. Indeed, the DPJ quickly showed itself to
be no more competent in governing Japan than its
much-derided opponent, the Liberal Democratic Party
(LDP).
After shedding its two albatrosses of Hatoyama and
general secretary Ichiro Ozawa, and many of its earlier
campaign pledges, the DPJ hoped for a respectable
showing in the last Upper House election. Instead, the
ruling DPJ suffered a stunning defeat, when voters had
the opportunity to show whether they were confident
in Prime Minister Naoto Kan’s just over 1-month-old
administration.
The party ended with only 106 seats, far short of the
122 needed for an outright majority. The gap is too
large to be filled by creating a coalition, because the
most likely potential partners also lost seats.

As a result, the DPJ coalition can no longer ensure
approval of its legislative initiatives.
A twisted parliament portends even greater legislative
stalemate and political gridlock. Gerald Curtis, a
professor at Columbia University in New York and a
long-time expert on Japanese politics, said the election
had returned Japan to the paralysis and gridlock of the
past few years. “You cannot pass a budget now in this
political environment. You’ll have weak and unstable
government. While the world changes fast, the Japanese
government will change very slowly”.
Trying to put a good face on the results, Kan said he
viewed the election as a “starting point” for his push
for a more responsible government ...
The policy implications of the election outcome do not
suggest an aggressive approach to monetary, fiscal or
structural policy over the next few months.
Indeed, the attention of the large parties will most
likely be focused on internal matters, leaving less time
for focus on the economy.
Gridlock is bad for the economy and for investor
sentiment if policy drift continues for a prolonged
period.
According to Alan Feldman, managing director at
Morgan Stanley in Tokyo, there are so many pressing
problems in the Japanese economy that the costs of
gridlock could be very high.
In particular, pressure on the Bank of Japan for more
aggressive monetary policy will likely be minimal, at
least until political disarray ends.
Without strong political leadership little progress is
likely on budget priorities.
The same goes for tax decisions.

At Shaw Capital Management we give you the information and insight you need to make the right investment choices.

Shaw Capital Management Investment Equity Markets 2010 Part 2

For the moment attention is focused on the strength
of the German economy, and the beneficial effects that
will be felt elsewhere in the zone; and there has also
been a relaxation of tension about debt defaults, after
the rescue package agreed by the member countries,
and the intervention by the ECB to support the weaker
bond markets.
The German export performance depends of the
maintenance of strong growth in the global economy
that may not be sustained; and the odds still suggest
that one or more of the weaker countries will at least
be forced to defer interest payments on its sovereign
debt, and may even default. The latest improvement
in the markets therefore seems likely to need further
support from Wall Street if it is to be sustained.
The best performance amongst the major markets over
the past month had occurred in the UK market. The
measures announced by the new Coalition government
to reduce the size of the fiscal deficit have been well
received by the market, despite the fact that they will
slow down the pace of the economic recovery over the
coming months; and the latest estimate of a 1.1% growth
rate in the second quarter of the year suggests that the
effects of the fiscal retrenchment might even be less
than had been expected, and has removed most of the
fears about the possibility of a move into a “double-
dip” recession.
The improvement in sentiment amongst investors is
therefore easy to understand.
Even before the announcement of the estimate of
growth in the second quarter of the year, there had
been further evidence of an improving economic
situation.
The unemployment rate fell; retail sales volumes rose
by 1%, the strongest monthly increase in almost a year;
and the latest quarterly survey from the CBI reported
that manufacturing output increased at its strongest
rate since 1995.

The 1.1% estimated rate was well above most forecasts.
It was the result of expansion in both the manufacturing
and services sectors of the economy.
But the most surprising figure was the estimated 6.6%
rate of growth in the construction sector that accounted
for around one third of the overall growth in the period.
It has also produced considerable interest regarding
the reaction of the Bank of England to these figures.
The bank has previously been mainly concerned about
the risk of slower growth, and had even considered at
the last meeting of its Monetary Policy Committee
“arguments in favour of a modest easing in monetary
policy” because “prospects for gross domestic product
growth had probably deteriorated a little over the
month”.
The mood will have changed now; but the governor,
Mervyn King, has recently indicated that there will be
no early changes in policy as a result of one set of
figures.
The background factors affecting the market therefore
remain. Short-term interest rates will remain low, and
the economy is performing better than expected; but
the austerity measures that are to be introduced, and
especially the increase in VAT in January, will depress
demand over the coming months.
It therefore seems likely that the UK market, like the
markets in mainland Europe, will need further support
from Wall Street if the recent strength is to be sustained.
The Japanese market is lower over the past month.
There has been further evidence that the pace of the
recovery in the Japanese economy is weakening; and
the poor performance by the ruling Democratic Party
in the recent election seems likely to lead to a period
of political uncertainty that will make it difficult for
action to be taken to reverse the trend.

The earlier decision to introduce measures to reduce
the massive fiscal deficit was a major reason for the
government’s poor election performance in the
election, and may well be reversed; and the Bank of
Japan’s action to try to increase the rate of bank lending,
especially to smaller companies, also seems unlikely
to have much of an effect on the economic situation.
The background situation in Japan is therefore very
disappointing, and this is reflected in the performance
of the equity market. It seems unlikely that there will
be any early improvement in the situation, and so the
Japanese market weakness looks set to continue.

At Shaw Capital Management we give you the information and insight you need to make the right investment choices.

Shaw to Host Conference Call to Discuss Global Strategic Partnership Announcement


The Shaw Group Inc. (NYSE: SHAW) today announced it will hold a conference call today, Nov. 29, 2010, at 11 a.m. Eastern time (10 a.m. Central time) to discuss a new global strategic partnership. A slide presentation will be posted on the Investor Relations page of Shaw's website at www.shawgrp.com approximately one hour prior to the conference call.

Interested parties may dial 1-800-588-4973 to listen to the conference call live or access a live audio webcast of the call on the Investor Relations page of Shaw's website at www.shawgrp.com.

A replay of the conference call will be available after the call by telephone, as well as on the company's website. To listen to the replay by telephone, dial 1-888-843-7419 and use pass code 28531133#.

The Shaw Group Inc. (NYSE:SHAW) is a leading global provider of engineering, construction, technology, fabrication, remediation and support services for clients in the energy, chemicals, environmental, infrastructure and emergency response industries. A Fortune 500 company with fiscal year 2010 annual revenues of $7 billion, Shaw has approximately 27,000 employees around the world and is the power sector industry leader according to Engineering News-Record's list of Top 500 Design Firms. For more information, please visit Shaw's website at www.shawgrp.com.

This press release contains forward-looking statements and information about our current and future prospects, operations and financial results, which are based on currently available information. Actual future results and financial performance could vary significantly from those anticipated in such statements.

Among the factors that could cause future events or transactions to differ from those we expect are those risks discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2010, our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended November 30, 2009, February 28, 2010, and May 31, 2010, and other reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). Please read our "Risk Factors" and other cautionary statements contained in these filings. Our current expectations may not be realized as a result of, among other things:

    * Changes in our clients' financial conditions, including their capital spending;
    * Our ability to obtain new contracts and meet our performance obligations;
    * Client contract cancellations or modifications to contract scope;
    * Worsening global economic conditions;
    * Changes to the regulatory environment;
    * Failure to achieve projected backlog.

As a result of these risks and others, actual results could vary significantly from those anticipated in this presentation, and our financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected. We undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, the occurrence of certain events, or otherwise.

Sunday, September 4, 2011

Shaw Capital Management Investment Equity Markets 2010 Part 1


Equity markets have rallied over the past month, sentiment has swung once again towards a more
optimistic view of the prospects for the global economy, and concerns about sovereign debt defaults in Europe have eased. Wall Street has recovered from the sharp sell-off in late-June, helped by some encouraging second quarter earnings reports; and markets in Europe have responded, with the UK market providing the best performance over the month. The worst performance amongst the major markets has occurred in the Japanese market because of disappointing economic news and increased political uncertainty after the setback for the government in the recent election. The general improvement in the markets over the month is a welcome development. The gloom in April and May about economic prospects was clearly overdone. The US economy is performing as expected, and the Chinese authorities are clearly intent on preventing their economy from overheating.

The global economic recovery will therefore proceed at a slow pace. The sovereign debt crisis in Europe remains unresolved and defaults remain a real possibility. The risks have therefore increased in the bond markets, and this has provided support for the equity markets. So long as monetary policy remains supportive, the global recovery should eventually produce a sustainable improvement in bond prices; but some of the current uncertainties in the bond markets must be resolved before this can occur.

The performance of the US economy remains the key factor is assessing the prospects for the equity markets. There has already been a request to Congress for additional spending programmes “to keep the economic recovery on track”, and although there has been no response so far, some action may become necessary. The excess gloom has disappeared, fears about sovereign debt defaults in Europe have eased, and there have been encouraging corporate results from a number of major companies, including Microsoft, Caterpillar, UPS, and Intel. Problems still remain in the banking sector, and have been reflected in the fall in earnings from investment banking at Goldman Sachs, Citigroup, Bank of America, and JPMorgan; but overall investors have been reassured that corporations are coping fairly
well with the present situation. Mainland European markets have also recovered from the sharp falls. There has been encouraging news about the economic background in the euro-zone; fears about
sovereign debt defaults have eased; and the latest “stress tests” have only revealed weaknesses in seven of the ninety-one banks that were included in the survey. Euro Markets have therefore been able to follow the upward trend on Wall Street, and regain recent losses, despite the uncertainties that have still to be resolved.

Conditions are clearly continuing to improve in many areas of the euro-zone economy, and especially in
Germany, helped by the big fall in the value of the euro in the first half of the year, and the strong growth in many of the export markets in the developing world. German companies have taken full advantage of the competitive currency and the available export opportunities, and so, even though domestic demand has remained relatively weak, the German economy is now expected to grow by around 2% this year. The situation is very different in Greece, Spain, Portugal, Ireland, and even in Italy, and these weaker economies are obviously acting as a drag on the overall performance of the area. The latest purchasing managers indices for both the manufacturing and services sectors of the area are higher, and argue against a pessimistic view of growth prospects; but for the moment we have left unchanged our modest forecasts of overall growth around 1.5% this year. The European Central Bank is clearly more optimistic about prospects. So far it has not raised its growth forecasts; but based presumably on the assumption that the recovery from recession is soundly based and self-sustaining, its reaction to the present situation contrasts sharply with the cautious view of the Fed.
The president, Jean Claude Trichet, is arguing that further public spending cuts and tax increases should be introduced immediately, especially in Europe, but also elsewhere in the industrialised world. “Without the swift and appropriate action of central banks” he recently argued, “and a very significant contribution from fiscal policies, we would have experienced a major recession. But now is the time to restore fiscal sustainability”.It is not clear what the consequences of this view might be; but the central bank might even be encouraged to tighten monetary policy as the present programme of fiscal retrenchment develops.


At Shaw Capital Management we give you the information and insight you need to make the right investment choices.

Shaw Capital Management Investment Portfolio Performance 2010


We have made no changes in our portfolios this month. The swing in sentiment towards a more favourable view of prospects for the global economy is encouraging, and has been reflected in the recovery in equity prices.

We have therefore decided to maintain our holdings in Euro & US equities. We continue to retain our 10% holding in cash deposits as a contingency measure. The sovereign debt crisis remains a very serious threat, thus we have zero exposure to bonds. World Growth There has been much talk in recent weeks of a ‘double- dip’ recession, as some weak figures have come out. However wobbles of this type are fairly typical in a recovery from a severe recession. In our view the recovery remains in line with the path we have laid out before. This was for a world recovery that would be restrained by raw material shortages, which would put constant upward pressure on their prices. So we see world growth this year at around the 4.5% rate, well below the 5.5% figure being registered at the height of the boom; notice that the world is not ‘catching up’ the lost output of 2009, rather it is reverting to a slower growth path from the lower output base. Even with this pattern raw material prices have been very strong, with oil for example near the $80 a barrel mark.

The rises in these prices forced China and India to tighten policy and restrain their fast recoveries to prevent inflation. Even now in India inflation is not yet under control, having reached 13.9% in May, and policy will need to tighten further. On a lesser scale inflation has become threatening in a number of emerging market countries. So what we are seeing is that the fast-recovering countries mainly in East Asia are having to restrain their growth. Meanwhile in the OECD countries where inflation remains muted … or in the case of Japan deflation remains entrenched; growth is much weaker than in East Asia. The reason for the disparity of growth lies
in the disparity of productivity growth.

In East Asia the movement of people out of low- productivity agriculture into high-productivity manufacturing using the technology imported from advanced countries implies huge productivity growth. In advanced OECD countries productivity growth is dependent on innovation, a much slower process. So we observe a world in which productivity and so GDP growth is restrained generally by tight raw material supplies and in which the OECD countries growth relatively more slowly also. This adds up to a weak recovery in OECD countries, which is what we observe. The picture is not likely to change. It will take time for new technologies and discoveries to shift the shortage of raw materials; there are parallels here with the 1970s and 1980s when it took until the end of the 1980s to ease the acute shortages built up in the earlier decades. By 1990 for example oil per unit of real world GDP had
roughly halved from the mid-1970s and oil prices fell to low levels. Nevertheless this does not mean that employment growth need be weak or unemployment remains high.

Labour market flexibility … i.e. real wages falling relative to general productivity and willingness to adopt new practices … can encourage substitution of more labour for capital and raw materials. This is most obvious in service industries where there is plenty of scope for higher labour-intensiveness. Furthermore, service industries themselves can grow faster when labour is more flexible. So could this weakness turn into a double-dip recession in the OECD? It might seem so if growth there is restrained by tight raw materials and if also
governments are pursuing fiscal tightening; the only way might seem to be downward pressure on growth. But this is to leave out the role of monetary policy. In the OECD inflation targeting has been the unsung hero of macro policy; inflation has stayed down in the recovery and deflation kept at bay during the 2009 recession.

The reason lies in the effectiveness of inflation targeting in anchoring expectations. Surprisingly also, many inflation expectations mirrored in wage settlements and bond yields have remained around the 2% mark, reflecting the inflation targets set by most OECD central banks or governments. But it should not be a surprise; the targets have reflected a popular change in overall policy, towards outlawing
high and variable inflation. We had it, people did not like it, and policy changed to stop it during the 1980s or at latest by the early 1990s. In the debate over recession and public debt the idea
that inflation should be used to tackle either problem has barely been discussed, let alone advocated in any serious way.

What this has meant is that monetary policy has been quite unhampered by the fear of inflation in its aim to keep recovery on track. With OECD banking systems mostly in difficulties credit growth has been held down — in most countries it is hardly positive. So monetary policy has had to use unconventional
means to encourage investment and consumption. Interest rates on official lending have been kept close to zero and central banks have aggressively bought financial assets from the public, with the effect that the yields on these assets have been reduced.

These purchase programmes have now been stopped. But if recovery looks threatened they can be restarted and will again have a powerful effect through these asset markets.

Two decades ago such programmes would have raised inflation expectations. Today they are given the benefit of the doubt. Some people argue that they are quite safe because bank credit and broad money therefore are hardly growing; however, one cannot be sure that other financial channels are not replacing banks while they are so weak.

The truth seems to be that firms and people who need finance are mostly able to obtain it on quite cheap terms, so banks are being bypassed to a substantial degree. But inflation is not expected to result because it is widely (and correctly) believed that if inflation were to start rising monetary policy would be tightened. This belief does free central banks to take aggressive action to prop up the economy if it falters.

In short we think that the recovery will continue much along the current lines because from above it is held down by raw material shortages while from below it is held up by potentially aggressive monetary policy, with the power to more than offset the dampening from fiscal retrenchment.

At Shaw Capital Management we give you the information and insight you need to make the right investment choices.

Shaw Capital Management Investment Financial Market Summary 2010


Financial Markets: Sentiment in the financial markets
improved considerably over the past month. There was
less concern about the possibility of a move into a
“double-dip” recession; and fears about sovereign debt
defaults also eased.

The improvement in conditions intensified the debate
about the relative merits of austerity measures and
further stimulus in the current situation, and revealed
a significant difference in the approach of the Fed and
the European Central Bank.

Equity Markets: Most of the equity markets recovered
strongly from the falls that had occurred at the end of
June, helped by some encouraging corporate results in
the US, and the relaxation of tension about debt defaults
in Europe.

Wall Street led the rally, and markets in Europe were
able to follow the upward trend, with the strength of
the German economy providing significant support.
The best performance amongst the major markets
occurred in the UK, as investors continued to react
favourably to the proposed measures announced by
the new UK government to reduce the huge fiscal
deficit. The worst performance amongst the majors
occurred in the Japanese market as economic and
financial conditions in Japan continued to deteriorate.
Government bond markets received some support
during the past month from the easing of tensions in
the sovereign debt markets in Europe. The recent
“shock and awe” support operation agreed by member
of the euro-zone, and the decision by the European
Central Bank to buy the bonds of some of the weaker
countries, has provided some reassurance for investors;
but considerable uncertainties remain about prospects
for the bond market.

The Fed is suggesting that further stimulatory measures
might be necessary, whilst at the same time the ECB is
warning that reductions in spending programmes and
increases in taxes were now necessary, in Europe, but
also elsewhere in the industrialised world. Movements
in bond markets have therefore been fairly limited
over the month.

Currency Markets: The feature of the currency markets
has been the swing in sentiment. This has allowed the
euro to rally strongly, helped also by the improving
sentiment about sovereign debt defaults; and sterling
has also moved higher after the announcement of
measures to reduce the fiscal deficit in the UK and the
more favourable economic news on the UK economy.
The best performance; has been achieved by the yen,
as its “safe haven” status has been further enhanced
by the more serious problems elsewhere in the currency
markets.

Short-Term Interest Rates: There have been no changes
in short-term interest rates in the major financial
markets over the past month.

Commodity markets have benefited from the general
improvement in financial markets over the past month.
Significant gains have occurred in base metal prices,
and in the prices of wheat and coffee amongst the soft
commodities.

Precious metal prices have fallen back, and oil prices
are basically unchanged over the month after rallying
strongly from recent lows.

At Shaw Capital Management we give you the information and insight you need to make the right investment choices.

Tuesday, August 30, 2011

Financial Markets Focusing Greece and Spain - Shaw Capital Management Newsletter


The situation in Greece and in Spain has obviously caused great concern in London. But the Bank is also aware of the risks as a time when the economy is still in a very fragile state, and of the need to compensate for the fiscal retrenchment by maintaining a supportive monetary policy, and low short-term interest rates. There are therefore reasons for concern about the prospects for sterling. If the latest measures do succeed in reducing the fiscal deficit to manageable levels without aborting the economic recovery, and if the problems affecting the euro continue, or become even more serious, then sterling may well maintain current levels or even appreciate further.

Shaw Capital Management, Korea - Investment Innovation & Excellence.  We provide the information, insight and expertise that you need to make the right investment choices. Shaw Capital Management Korea typically offers its clients such services as asset allocation and portfolio design; traditional and non-traditional manager review and selection; portfolio implementation; portfolio monitoring and consolidated performance reporting; and other wealth management services, including estate, tax, trust and insurance planning, asset custody, closely held business issues associated with the establishment or expansion of a family office, the formation of family investment partnerships or LLCs, philanthropy, family dynamics and inter-generation issues, etc.


But the situation is very uncertain, and the odds do seem to favour a further period of weakness until the effects of the latest government measures can be more accurately assessed.

The yen has weakened slightly over the past month as the improvement in market sentiment has increased
the “risk appetite” of investors for the equity markets, and for commodity-related currencies.

The economic background in Japan has continued to improve, helped by the export performance; but there are still doubts about whether this improvement can be sustained, and these doubts have been increased by the latest announcement by the new prime minister that the main priority of his government will be a reduction in the huge fiscal deficit, rather than the promotion of fresh measures to accelerate the growth rate.

There is also a further uncertainty created by the decision by the Chinese authorities to adopt a “more flexible” policy on the renminbi that presumably means that it will be allowed to appreciate slightly faster. It is not clear what the consequences of this move will be; but overall it seems likely that conditions elsewhere, especially those affecting the euro, and some disappointment with “risky” investments in global markets, will continue to provide some stability to the Japanese currency.

Shaw Capital Management August Newsletter: Financial Markets Focusing Europe


The big fall in the euro in recent months is clearly having a significant impact on the performance of the
euro-zone economy.

Shaw Capital Management, Korea - Investment Innovation & Excellence.  We provide the information, insight and expertise that you need to make the right investment choices. Shaw Capital Management Korea typically offers its clients such services as asset allocation and portfolio design; traditional and non-traditional manager review and selection; portfolio implementation; portfolio monitoring and consolidated performance reporting; and other wealth management services, including estate, tax, trust and insurance planning, asset custody, closely held business issues associated with the establishment or expansion of a family office, the formation of family investment partnerships or LLCs, philanthropy, family dynamics and inter-generation issues, etc.


Factory output expanded at a record pace in April, helped by investment spending associated with the export effort, and overseas demand for European capital equipment, and the trend appears to be continuing. The major beneficiary has been Germany, but other northern member countries are also involved.

However the situation is much less encouraging in Greece, Spain, and Portugal, because they are less competitive in export markets, and are being forced to introduce austerity measures to reduce their fiscal deficits.

Domestic demand across the entire euro-zone remains weak, and so, despite the export performance of some member countries, it seems unlikely that the overall growth rate for the zone this year will reach 2%. The European Central Bank remains reasonably optimistic about prospects; but fortunately it has not moved towards an “exit strategy” that might involve reversing the measures that were introduced to counter the recession.

Short-term interest rates have been left unchanged and close to zero, the programme to provide unlimited three-month loans to the banking system is continuing, and the bank is also still intervening in the markets to buy the bonds of weaker member countries that had been sold heavily because of fears about debt defaults. The bank is therefore continuing to provide support for the system; but it is not really doing enough to offset the concerns about the debt crisis.

Greece remains in the eye of the storm; but there have been increasing concerns about the situation in Spain; and the situation has been made worse by the latest warning from the Fitch Ratings agency that it may take further massive asset purchases by the European Central Bank to prevent the sovereign debt crisis in the area escalating out of control.

Shaw Capital Management August 2010: Financial Markets Focusing Europe - There are fears that Spain will need to follow Greece in requesting help from other member countries and the IMF to enable it to avoid a default, and that Portugal, and perhaps even Italy, may also need to be rescued.

The pressures on the euro will therefore be intense; and whilst there may well be further support from the Swiss National Bank and others, the future of the single currency system clearly remains very uncertain. The latest modest rally in the euro must therefore be treated with great care.

Sterling has recovered from the weakness that developed in May, and is ending the month higher. The economic background in the UK has not provided any real support, and the Bank of England is clearly intending to maintain short-term interest rates at very low levels; but there has been some movement of funds out of the euro into sterling, and the new coalition government in the UK has introduced measures to reduce the massive fiscal deficit that have been well received in the markets and led to an improvement in sentiment.

There is clearly a risk that these latest measures in the Budget will depress the level of activity still further, and fail to solve the fiscal problems; but for the moment it seems that the new government is being given the benefit of the doubt.

The evidence on the performance of the economy ahead of the Budget announcement was still pointing to a very slow recovery in activity.

The manufacturing sector is reasonably buoyant, with exports expanding rapidly; and retail sales also increased more quickly than expected.

But unemployment rose again to 2.47 million, and the latest survey from the CBI indicated that the value and volume of business in the services sector fell, and that further weakness was expected in the second half of the year.

However the situation has obviously been changed significantly by the latest Budget measures, and the latest estimates from the newly-formed Office for Budget Responsibility are that growth will now only be 1.2% this year, rising to 2.3% next year, and improving slightly in succeeding years.

The Bank of England has welcomed the decision by the new government to introduce measures to address the problems created by the huge fiscal deficit. The governor, Mervyn King, argued recently that they would “eliminate some of the downside risks…and are desirable to remove the risk of an adverse market reaction.”

Shaw Capital Management August 2010: Financial Markets


Sentiment in the financial markets has improved over the past month. There has been further evidence that
the recovery in the global economy is continuing; the sovereign debt crisis in Europe has not yet produced a major casualty; there has been a modest rally in the euro; and the Chinese authorities have announced that they intend to adopt a “more flexible” policy towards the renminbi that is expected to allow it to appreciate at a slightly faster rate.

Shaw Capital Management August 2010: Financial Markets - These developments have suggested that the gloom was overdone. The effect in the currency markets had been to slightly weaken both the dollar and the yen, as the “risk appetite” amongst investors and traders has increased, and to strengthen the commodity-linked currencies and ease the pressures on the euro. Sterling has also improved over the month, helped by the measures announced by the new coalition government in the UK, both before and during the recent budget statement, to significantly reduce the huge fiscal deficit.

Shaw Capital Management  views on financial market - But overall movements in the major currencies have been fairly small, and there is still considerable optimism about prospects.

The latest evidence on the performance of the US economy has enhanced the prospects for the dollar, and this should also continue to provide some stability for the yen.

The sovereign debt problems in Greece, Spain, Portugal, and even in Italy, continue to worsen, and may well lead to defaults and put further pressure on the single currency system.

There must also be serious doubts about the latest improvement in sterling.

The new government in the UK is making credible efforts to reduce the size of the fiscal deficit; but it faces a daunting task, and will find it very difficult to maintain its tough stance.

There is therefore a serious risk of a crisis in the UK currency market, and so it is crucial that the international agencies prepare contingency measures to enable them to act quickly if the situation appears to be running out of control.

The latest available evidence on the performance of the US economy; show the recovery from recession remains on track.

Retail sales were 1.2% lower in May than in April, emphasising the cautious mood amongst consumers; non-farm payrolls increased by 431,000 in May, but 411,000 jobs were accounted for by temporary government hiring to complete the 2010 census, leaving the increase in “real” jobs well below expectations; new home starts fell sharply in May following the withdrawal of government measures to prop up the market, and existing home sales also fel.

And the M3 measure of broad money growth is also continuing to decline because of weak loan demand from reliable borrowers, and the reluctance of the banks to lend to anyone else. There are offsetting factors in the strength of the manufacturing sector; and consumer confidence figures remain reasonably strong.

The Commerce Department has recently revised its estimate of growth in the first quarter of the year down to a 3% annualised rate; but this rate may not have been maintained in the current quarter; and this has already led to a strong plea to Congress from the government to authorise additional spending programmes costing up to $50 billion “to keep the recovery on track”, it is not clear how Congress will respond.

The Fed chairman, Ben Bernanke’s recently testimony to Congress; that the pace of the recovery will not be strong enough to fix the jobs market or reduce the budget deficit without further help, also argued that, despite the size of that deficit, “to avoid sharp, disruptive shifts in spending programmes and tax
policies in the future, and to retain the confidence of the public and the markets, we should start planning now how we will meet these budgetary challenges”. This view about the economy is repeated in the statement after the latest meeting of the bank’s Open Market Committee, and so, although the bank believes
that the recovery is continuing, it is not surprising that it is quietly considering what steps it might have to take if the recovery unexpectedly falters.

There has been a modest recovery in the euro from a low-point in the early part of the past month, although it is still ending the period slightly lower.

The economic background in the euro-zone is continuing to improve, and there has been evidence of support for the euro, particularly from the Swiss National Bank, which reported an increase in its foreign currency reserves of more than $100 billion in May. But the benefits have been limited by the on-going sovereign debt problems amongst some member countries of the euro-zone, and especially by the serious deterioration in the situation in Spain, and so the improvement that has occurred remains very fragile.

Sunday, August 21, 2011

Commodity Markets - Shaw Capital Management Investment


The general improvement in sentiment in the financial markets over the past month has also been evident in the commodity markets.

There has been further evidence that the global economic recovery in continuing, there has been more support for the view that the pressures resulting from the sovereign debt crisis in Europe may be easing.

As a result, base metals are generally lower over the month, even after the rally on the latest Chinese announcement about the renminbi; most soft commodity prices are slightly lower, although there have been sharp rises in beverage prices on concerns about future supplies; precious metal prices have moved higher as investors have continued to seek “safe havens in the storm”; and there has been a strong recovery in oil prices, helped by optimistic signs of a pick up in US demand.

Base metal prices are ending the past month well above recent low levels, but still slightly lower overall, and there has been an additional boost to confidence in the announcement of a “more flexible” policy towards the renminbi.

It is assumed that even a modest appreciation of the Chinese currency will boost the purchasing power of Chinese buyers, and increase still further China’s position as the world’s largest importer of a broad range of global commodities.

But there is clearly a risk that the importance of this fairly modest move is being exaggerated; and the extent of the earlier reaction should be a powerful warning of the degree of speculative activity in the markets, and the vulnerability of prices. Chinese demand clearly remains a critical factor, and the evidence suggests that it will remain reasonably strong.

Soft commodity markets have again produced a more mixed performance.

Movements in grain prices have been fairly modest, although there has been some support from a recent report by the US Department of Agriculture that the increasing importance of ethanol production will continue to draw down stock levels and help to offset the effects of what is expected to be a bumper grain crop this year.

Most price movements elsewhere have been fairly small; but there have been two significant exceptions. Cocoa prices have been pushed to their highest levels for more than 30 years because of disappointing crop levels in West Africa, and particularly in the Ivory Coast, and the warning that the fall in production will continue unless there is significant investment in new trees and in fertilisers.

There are fears that demand will outstrip supply for the fifth successive year in the 2010/2011 season, and this has forced cocoa buyers to push up prices to cover their requirements, and has exposed the position of banks and others that sold call options in the expectation that prices would fall. The second significant exception has been coffee prices, which have increased by almost 20% during the past month.

The indications are that one commodity-trading house has accumulated a very large number of futures contracts and has indicated that it intends to take delivery of the coffee.

Other funds that had sold futures contracts short have been unable to obtain the coffee to honour those contracts, and so have been forced to scramble to close them and have suffered considerable losses as prices have moved higher.

It is not yet clear whether this technical position has now been cleared; but the fundamentals do not appear to justify the price action, since Brazilian production is expected to be very high in the current season, and so, once the technical position had been cleared, prices could fall fairly sharply.

Oil prices have also been affected by the improvement in market sentiment, and have recovered very sharply over the past month.

Speculative activity has been an important factor; but there has also been an encouraging report from the US Department of Energy indicating strong demand for oil products in the US, and a larger-than-expected reduction in crude oil inventories.

There has also been evidence of continuing strong demand from China; and a warning of the onset of the hurricane season in the Gulf of Mexico, and its possible effects on production levels.

So far however the dramatic oil spill at the BP production well in the Gulf does not appear to have had a noticeable effect on market prices, although the possible consequences, especially for deep-water drilling operations in the future, could clearly become a very significant factor.

The recovery in prices has been very impressive; but it may not be sustainable. OPEC itself has recently issued a very cautious monthly report which argues that “recent developments have moved oil prices out of equilibrium”, and which emphasises that increasing supplies from non-OPEC countries are keeping downward pressure on prices.

It concludes, that “although demand has seen some improvement recently, it has been more than overwhelmed by the higher growth in supply”. It seems likely therefore that the present rally will lose momentum unless there is a serious deterioration in the political situation in the Middle East. Precious metal prices have also moved higher over the past month; investors are clearly still seeking “safe havens in the storm” despite the improvement in sentiment about prospects that has pushed some other commodity prices higher.

Gold prices have reached $1250 per ounce, and silver prices have also moved significantly higher, with exchange-traded funds aggressive buyers of both metals.

The World Gold Council, in its recent quarterly report, indicated that demand for gold was “exceptionally strong”, and that it was expected to remain so for the rest of year, “driven by jewellery demand in India and China, and investment demand in the US and in Europe”.

However it is clear that investment demand is the more important factor, with EFT gold holdings now above 2000 tons, and central banks also adding to their holdings again.

There is an obvious risk that the latest surge in prices will lead to some profit taking. But given the present situation, and particularly the risk of sovereign debt defaults, it would be unwise to assume that the improvement in precious metal prices in over.

At Shaw Capital Management we give you the information and insight you need to make the right investment choices.

Shaw Capital Management Korea: Portfolio Recommendations


We have made no changes in our portfolios this month.
The latest developments in the government debt
markets have increased the uncertainties about
prospects for both the bond and financial markets.
However, although the pace of the global economic
recovery may be affected, there appears to be enough
momentum to enable it to continue.

We have therefore maintained the level of our exposure
to the equity markets; and we have left 10% of the funds
in the portfolio in cash deposits as a contingency
measure. Bond exposure is zero.

Shaw Capital Management Korea: Portfolio
Recommendations - The UK Hung Parliament

The bond markets are totally calm about the hung
Parliament, as they are about both UK and US bond
prospects, with yields still below 4%, in spite of the
huge deficits both countries are running.

What is going on?

The first point is that both countries are recovering,
and seem set for growth rates in the 2–3% range.
Such growth is not ‘V-shaped’ but a V was unlikely
given the shortage of oil and raw materials, which
continues to limit world recovery potential. It does
give a prospect of improving tax revenues and falling
benefit expenditures.
As growth goes forward it will be possible to work out
more accurately how much of the current deficit is
‘structural’ — i.e. will not disappear with returning
growth.

For the UK the current estimate is that about 8% of
GDP is structural: still requiring a huge programme of
retrenchment.

The second point is that neither the UK nor the US has
ever formally defaulted in modern times.

Indeed for the UK, they can date this from the end of
the Napoleonic Wars when public debt reached around
300% of GDP.

The third point is the new unwillingness to use higher
inflation to bring down the debt in real value. Inflation
(implying an ‘inflation tax’ on government monetary
liabilities which thereby lose their value) is now
proscribed after the poor experiences of developed
countries during the ‘great inflation’ of the 1970s.
Electorates have rejoiced at the new inflation targeting
policies that have formally ended governments’
experiments with this form of taxation.
The electorates hated the messy and unintended
redistributions of wealth this tax implied — often from
the weak such as pensioners to the wealthy and the
unionized.

In this context bond markets have treated Mr. Obama’s
delays and the UK’s election result as simply policy
deferred.

In that they are likely to be right.

Shaw Capital Management Korea: Portfolio
Recommendations - The state of the eurozone

By contrast the situation in the euro-zone looks
increasingly difficult.

The problem is that Greece and Portugal — the two
main current problem cases — joined the euro in the
expectation that low interest rates would keep their
public finances under control.

Internally these countries have difficulty in raising
taxes and curbing expenditure but joining the EU and
then the euro gave them the authority to insist on fiscal
discipline as the ‘price’ of joining.

Now the discipline is becoming harsh and yet interest
rate premia are rising, as the risk of default increases.
Germany and the other euro-zone countries are
unwilling to transfer resources to them — and even to
provide loans on terms below these market rates.
Germany’s position in particular has hardened
massively under hostile home reactions to perceived
‘bail-out’.

Germany is simply unwilling to make transfers after
the huge costs of its integration policies for East
Germany.

There will come a point where the advantages of being
in the euro are outweighed by the disadvantages for a
country like Greece.

Once interest rate premia get high enough inside the
euro, the attraction of floating the currency down
outside it and still paying similar interest rates will
become overwhelming to governments faced with
public hostility to further sacrifice.

A large devaluation is a way of allowing the economy
to recover and produce extra revenue.
Furthermore reintroducing the local currency will
allow the government to re-denominate the debt in
that new sovereign currency … so effecting a de facto
partial default.

These exits would not spell the end of the euro. But
they will remind markets that the euro is bound
together by political convenience only and not by some
deep commitment to European integration.
Up to now there has been a general belief in such a
commitment; however, Germany’s recent actions have
destroyed this belief.

It was this belief that kept interest rate premia down
on sovereign debt of euro-zone countries; rather like
the debt of UK local authorities — formally underwritten
by the UK government, it was felt that these countries’
debt was being implicitly underwritten by other eurozone
members. No longer.

But of course what can happen to Greece could happen
to any other country. If so its risk premia too would
rise and it too would face the same trade-off between
staying in or exiting with the freedom to float at similar
interest rates outside.

Hence the chances of more break-up would get larger
and the system would become gradually closer to a
system of ‘fixed but adjustable’ exchange rates like the
old European Monetary System.